Skip to content

Investigation engine · version 2.6.0

VERITY Forensic Case Builder

A signal is an argument that something is worth looking at. A claim is an assertion someone can be sued over. The case builder exists to keep the second from inheriting the confidence of the first.

Reconstruction

Rebuild the number, then state the difference

The case builder does not interrogate the reported figure. It builds an independent figure from primary records and puts the two side by side, with the method note attached to the number rather than buried in an appendix.

  1. 01

    Inputs are primary

    Trust remittances, registry filings, borrowing bases, dockets and shipment records. Market data corroborates, it never forms a basis.

  2. 02

    Method travels with the figure

    Every reconstructed number carries the sources, the period and the arithmetic. A reviewer can rebuild it without asking the analyst.

  3. 03

    Variance is stated, not implied

    The product never says a figure is wrong. It says the reconstruction differs by a stated amount on a stated basis.

VC-2026-014 · demonstration reconstruction

Calloway Brands: receivables pledged twice, collections rerouted

As reportedReconstructed
  • Gross receivables, period endUSD millions
    214.6
    173.4

    Reconstructed from trust remittances and two facility borrowing bases.

  • Collections routed through affiliate servicerUSD millions
    0
    88.1

    Not disclosed as a related-party flow in any period.

  • Receivables pledged under two facilitiesUSD millions
    0
    41.2

    Overlap derived from collateral descriptions and perfection dates.

  • Days sales outstandingdays
    58
    91

    Reconstructed using shipment records from two acquired subsidiaries.

Fictional figures. Reported values are as filed in the demonstration data set.

Hypothesis challenge

A claim that has not survived an alternative explanation is not a claim

Before anything reaches counsel, the case builder generates the explanations that would make the finding innocent, tests each one against the record, and keeps the result whether it helps or not.

Claim 501 · VC-2026-014

Supported

A receivables pool of approximately 41.2 million dollars secured two facilities at the same time without a subordination or release on file.

3 evidence items · 2 alternatives tested

  1. Alternative

    The second filing is a defensive refiling after a lapsed continuation.

    Test

    Continuation history pulled for the 2024 filing.

    Result

    Rejected. The 2024 perfection remained active on the filing date.

  2. Alternative

    The collateral descriptions cover different pools despite similar wording.

    Test

    Description compared against the borrowing base schedules of both facilities.

    Result

    Rejected. Both borrowing bases draw on the same distribution segment.

Counsel disposition

Cleared for the claim set. Quantified figure must carry the method note.

Claims are graded supported, partially supported, unsupported or refuted. A refuted claim stays in the matrix with its refutation, because the record of what failed is part of what makes the surviving claims credible.

Patterns

Pattern analysis against a cohort, not against intuition

Every pattern reading is stated next to the benchmark it is being judged against, so a reviewer can argue with the benchmark instead of guessing at it.

PatternReadingBenchmark
Receivables to revenue divergence31 percent receivables growth against 4 percent revenue declineSector cohort: 6 percent growth on 3 percent revenue growth
Round-number clustering in adjusting entries26 percent of quarter-end adjustments end in three zerosExpected range 6 to 9 percent
Perfection-to-amendment intervalSecond perfection filed 8 days before the cash management amendmentNo benign sequence observed in the comparison set
Confirmation response rate2 of 9 requested confirmations returnedEngagement standard is complete response

Gates

Five gates, each with an owner and an inspectable state

Gates are not a checklist at the end. They hold the work that depends on them from the moment the case opens.

  1. 01

    Evidence sufficiency

    Analyst of record

    Every numeric claim traces to at least two independent documents, and primary origin is counted separately from secondary.

  2. 02

    Originality

    Analyst of record

    Original analysis is separated from public record. A finding that restates a published report is labeled as such and cannot carry the case.

  3. 03

    Jurisdiction

    Counsel

    Where the registrant files, where the conduct occurred, and whether any element depends on foreign discovery.

  4. 04

    Privilege screen

    Counsel

    Unsolicited material is quarantined at intake and excluded from every claim until counsel disposes of it.

  5. 05

    Counsel review

    Counsel

    Claim by claim, with a disposition field only counsel writes. Returned claims name what is missing.

Readiness is not submission

A case carries a readiness percentage so a client can see how far a matter has come. VERITY never prepares, signs or transmits a submission to the Commission or any other regulator on its own initiative. There is no submission endpoint in the platform. Counsel clears the gate, the client instructs in writing, and the client or its counsel files.

Access

See the radar run against your own credit book

A scoped pilot runs your obligor list through the four discovery layers for one quarter, with a named analyst and counsel review on every escalation.